top of page

Navigating China’s New Guidelines for Patent Applications on AI-Related Inventions

Writer: Kaushik KarmakarKaushik Karmakar

Navigating China’s New Guidelines for Patent Applications on AI-Related Inventions

China has taken a significant step forward in regulating intellectual property in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI). The National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) recently issued the Guidelines for Patent Applications for AI-Related Inventions (Trial Implementation). These guidelines mark a critical development in aligning patent law with the complexities of AI innovation. Below, we delve into the key aspects of the guidelines, the types of AI-related patent applications they cover, and their implications for inventors and businesses.


A Rapidly Introduced Framework


The guidelines were officially issued after a brief public comment period on the draft version, released on December 6, 2024. The unusually short one-week feedback window, though controversial, signals CNIPA’s urgency in implementing these measures. However, this approach contravenes the not-yet-effective Regulations on the Procedures for Formulating Regulations of the CNIPA, which mandate a 30-day minimum for public commentary. Despite this procedural inconsistency, the new guidelines provide much-needed clarity for navigating AI patent applications.


The Four Types of AI-Related Patent Applications


The guidelines categorize AI-related patent applications into four types, each with its own unique considerations:


1. Patents for AI Algorithms or Models


These patents focus on the core of AI innovation—the algorithms and models themselves. These encompass:


  • Machine learning

  • Deep learning

  • Neural networks

  • Fuzzy logic

  • Genetic algorithms


Such applications involve improving or optimizing the AI models, including their structure, training processes, or compression techniques. These innovations are pivotal for advancing AI’s capability to simulate human intelligence and solve complex problems.


2. Patents for Functional or Field Applications


This category addresses the integration of AI into specific applications. It includes inventions where AI is embedded into products, methods, or processes. For instance:


  • AI-driven image sharpening in electron microscopes

  • Applications in natural language processing, speech synthesis, and computer vision

  • Knowledge graphs and data mining for discovering patterns and trends


The focus is on applying AI to enhance technological capabilities in industries such as transportation, telecommunications, healthcare, security, finance, and education.


3. Patents for AI-Assisted Inventions


These are inventions developed with the assistance of AI as a tool. AI’s role here is analogous to a supportive instrument, enabling the inventor to identify specific outcomes more efficiently. For example:


  • Using AI to identify protein binding sites during drug development


Here, the inventor’s creative input remains essential, as AI serves only as an auxiliary technology.


4. Patents for AI-Generated Inventions


AI-generated inventions are those created autonomously by AI systems without substantial human contribution. For instance, an AI-designed food container could fall under this category. However, these inventions present a legal dilemma, as current Chinese patent law mandates that inventors must be natural persons.


AI Cannot Be an Inventor: Legal Implications


The guidelines emphasize a foundational principle: the inventor must be a natural person. Here’s how this principle unfolds:


  • Natural Persons Only Section 4.1.2 of the guidelines specifies that the inventor must be an individual. Neither entities nor AI systems qualify as inventors under Chinese law. This requirement stems from the civil rights framework, which recognizes only human individuals as holders of intellectual property rights.


  • Creative Contribution Required The inventor must make a creative contribution to the essential features of the invention. For AI-assisted inventions, the human contributor who significantly shaped the invention’s substantive features can claim inventorship. Conversely, AI-generated inventions lack this human element and thus cannot meet the legal definition of inventorship.


Highlights and Examples of Subject Matter Eligibility


The guidelines offer several examples of what qualifies as patentable subject matter in AI-related inventions. Notable highlights include:


  • Eligibility of AI algorithms: Innovations in algorithmic structure or training methodologies

  • Integration of AI in applications: AI-enabled solutions for industry-specific challenges

  • Exclusions for AI-generated work: Emphasizing the necessity of human involvement


Opportunities and Challenges


These guidelines provide much-needed clarity for stakeholders, fostering a more predictable patent environment for AI innovations. However, the short public consultation period and restrictions on AI-generated inventions pose challenges:


  • Opportunities: Companies and inventors can leverage these guidelines to secure protection for AI-driven innovations, especially in functional applications and model advancements.

  • Challenges: The prohibition against naming AI as an inventor creates legal ambiguity for businesses relying heavily on autonomous AI systems for innovation.


Implications for Businesses and Innovators


China’s proactive stance in regulating AI-related patents demonstrates its commitment to staying at the forefront of AI development. For businesses and innovators:


  • Compliance is key: Adhering to the guidelines ensures smooth navigation of the patent process.


  • Strategic positioning: Leveraging the guidelines can help businesses secure a competitive edge in AI-driven markets.


  • Global competitiveness: These measures align with international practices, enhancing China’s appeal as an innovation hub.


Conclusion: A Landmark Move in AI Patent Law


The Guidelines for Patent Applications for AI-Related Inventions reflect China’s ambition to lead in the global AI race. While challenges persist, such as the exclusion of AI-generated inventions, the guidelines provide a robust framework for fostering innovation. By balancing regulation with encouragement, China aims to create a fertile ground for AI advancements, cementing its position as a global leader in intellectual property and AI innovation.

 

Follow LexTalk World for more news and updates from International Legal Industry.

 


 

Comments


bottom of page